Anyone working with The Bingo Affiliates?

[suffolkpoker]

Surely you'd be kind enough to post their licensing information here along with a link to the reputable licensing body that governs them

A Follow-up:
So I did some looking into things. My minor communication issue was quickly resolved.

As for Suffolkpoker`s comments, The Bingo Affiliates are in-fact licenced and have been in operation since 1999. I`m guessing any company around that long might have a few complaints against it but NOTHING warranting blacklisting.

It seems as though the "helpful" comment posted by Suffolkpoker may not have been that genuine and might be more related to unethical bashing of bingo brands not currently being promoted by his internet-bingo.co website. Nice try Suffolk.

And when you dig deep enough, there are a few red-flags on the net about internet-bingo.co and a couple of their brands aswell.


Thanks to everyone else though,

Lucky Bob
YoureInLuckNow

[Shay]

A Follow-up:
So I did some looking into things. My minor communication issue was quickly resolved.

As for Suffolkpoker`s comments, The Bingo Affiliates are in-fact licenced and have been in operation since 1999. I`m guessing any company around that long might have a few complaints against it but NOTHING warranting blacklisting.

It seems as though the "helpful" comment posted by Suffolkpoker may not have been that genuine and might be more related to unethical bashing of bingo brands not currently being promoted by his internet-bingo.co website. Nice try Suffolk.

And when you dig deep enough, there are a few red-flags on the net about internet-bingo.co and a couple of their brands aswell.


Thanks to everyone else though,

Lucky Bob
YoureInLuckNow

Are you by chance associated with the company that you were asking about beyond merely being an affiliate? Your response sounds (to me) that it has more of a defensive tone in it than it does a tone that was truly asking for help/feedback or posting "replies" if you "find out anything."

What was it that you found specific to the affiliate program you asked about that doesn't involve attempting to discredit someone's offer of help?

[Lucky Bob]

Are you by chance associated with the company that you were asking about beyond merely being an affiliate? Your response sounds (to me) that it has more of a defensive tone in it than it does a tone that was truly asking for help/feedback or posting "replies" if you "find out anything."

What was it that you found specific to the affiliate program you asked about that doesn't involve attempting to discredit someone's offer of help?

My original post was an honest question:

"Is anyone working with "The Bingo Affiliates?" (Amigo Bingo, Canadian Dollar Bingo et al)
What's been your experience? I haven't had any luck getting a hold of anyone there incuding my affiliate manager. Does anyone know if something's happening over there?"

....which resulted in someone doing a "quick search" and blacklisting a site they claim to never have even heard of. Their response had nothing at all to do with my question and seemed (to me) to have a motive of it's own - which, again wasn't at all helpful. So yes, my tone might sound a bit defensive...I was appreciative at first but now, not so much.

I did find CarbonAtil's comments helpful and relevant so thank you CarbonAtil.

Regards,

Lucky Bob

[Shay]

My original post was an honest question:

....which resulted in someone doing a "quick search" and blacklisting a site they claim to never have even heard of. Their response had nothing at all to do with my question and seemed (to me) to have a motive of it's own - which, again wasn't at all helpful. So yes, my tone might sound a bit defensive...I was appreciative at first but now, not so much.

So, what you're saying is that someone who did a "quick search" and found information that is going to be beneficial to his readers and also possibly helpful to you and maybe even related to your question is self-serving? It sounds to me that for reasons personal to him, he found sufficient evidence to steer his visitors away from those sites, published his findings, and then linked this thread to it - all while claiming "here are my findings." And his findings were perhaps the reason you were having a difficult time in getting in touch with the affiliate program you were asking about.

While I would step out and say you're certainly welcome to agree or disagree with his findings and post, I'd suggest that a "thank you, but I respectfully disagree with your findings in that article" would be more appropriate than trying to slap the man in the face for trying to help you.

[Lucky Bob]

Again, the response was irrelevant to my question but you are right, I should not have slapped the man - no matter what his motives were/are or what I suspect them to be.

So in that spirit, SuffolkPoker, sorry and thank you, but I respectfully disagree with the findings in your "article."


I'm sure every single person in this wider forum knows you can find negatives about any site by typing in the right keywords and now that I think about it, I should have given everyone credit for being able to take this guy's comments "with their own grain of salt."

Respectfully,

Lucky Bob

[Shay]

So in that spirit, SuffolkPoker, sorry and thank you, but I respectfully disagree with the findings in your "article."

To the next point, what exactly were you disagreeing with in his findings? His article claims that the sites named have poor support, are not licensed, have unreasonably high fees for players, a limit on cashing out, and there were claims of misleading info in regards to winnings, so which point or points are you "respectfully disagreeing" with? Are you saying that they have great support, are licensed, do not have high fees for cashing out, do not have limits on cashout requests, and there is not misleading information regarding their winnings?

The only thing I can agree with you on is that his response was "seemingly" irrelevant to your question. However, if his post claims that customer support is horrible, then he was telling you in a round-about way that you're not the only one having issues getting in touch with these fellas and the article he wrote on the topic possibly explained why.