Open Challenge to PAL

[jdwanchalk]

This is my challenge, to help me get to where I want to be.

I challenge one (or more) other person to create 100,000 words of new, unique, legitimate content over a month period, for three consecutive months. I will do the same.

In the end, 300,000 words of unique content will have been created over a 3 month period.

$2,000 will be wagered by each side (or even multiple sides) of the challenge.

If anyone participating fails or gives up, their $2,000 is split amongst the other members. If everyone succeeds, no money is won or lost.

One judge can be appointed to determine whether someone has a legitimate excuse for backing out of the challenge.

If you happen to already be doing this monthly, this is not for you. Content can obviously not be purchased.

Does anyone want to accept this? If this goes as planned, all will see dramatic progress with their sites.

[addaminsane]

so what are the stipulations of the domain name. And why would i be encouraged to do this if i was someone who just got a hold of some "good" domains that have alot of monetary potential.

i don't understand the challenge, is it who makes the most money, or who develops the "best site" after a year. Can a "good" domain name be apart of the challenge?

Also, how is the site judged on being "good"

example - can playcasinopokeronline.com qualify? it is a new setup, but also a domain with alot of monetary potential. I don't really have alot of ambition to overly develop this domain into an "extensive" site, but a challenge could make it fun i guess.

[jdwanchalk]

so what are the stipulations of the domain name. And why would i be encouraged to do this if i was someone who just got a hold of some "good" domains that have alot of monetary potential.

i don't understand the challenge, is it who makes the most money, or who develops the "best site" after a year. Can a "good" domain name be apart of the challenge?

Also, how is the site judged on being "good"

example - can playcasinopokeronline.com qualify? I don't really have alot of ambition to overly develop this domain, but a challenge could make it fun i guess.

What? The challenge is to create 100,000 words of content per month, for three consecutive months. I don't know what you're talking about.

Note: I edited the OP to help alleviate any confusion.

[addaminsane]

well im confused then about what you meant about your first sentence of domain name value. What does that have to do with the challenge?

[jdwanchalk]

well im confused then about what you meant about your first sentence of domain name value. What does that have to do with the challenge?

I removed it, I guess it made more sense to include that in the context of the OP to me than to others.

[addaminsane]

i'm trying to figure out in my mind if this challenge is possible with unique content apart from writing 5+ ridiculously extensive news articles / blog posts per day for ninety days in edition to a bunch of standard articles.

[jdwanchalk]

i'm trying to figure out in my mind if this challenge is possible with unique content apart from writing 5+ ridiculously extensive news articles / blog posts per day for ninety days in edition to a bunch of standard articles.

[jdwanchalk]

As an alternative, I would make the same bet with someone who is not actually writing. If I do the writing, you lose $2000. I if I don't, you win $2000.

[addaminsane]

when could this start? could it start in june and be with a site that simply currently has a small amount of content on it? sounds like a fun summer challenge

Participants have to previously note the current number of cached pages in the index?

[jdwanchalk]

when could this start? could it start in june and be with a site that simply currently has a small amount of content on it? sounds like a fun summer challenge

Participants have to previously note the current number of cached pages in the index?

I will start as soon as anyone is ready. I think a combination of good faith and indexed pages works, but you can't have content stock piled that you never uploaded. This should be for the participant's benefit.