...
Last edited by taxman; 09-03-2011 at 12:58 PM.
fwiw i wasn't implying google was the first search engine. i started using the internet around circa '98 and was using search engines before the inception of the mammoth. my point was google's search engine brought search and essentially the information library which is the internet to the world. if that didn't happen, i don't think you can just assume another company would have achieved the same success, and that search would be as big as it is today, so for that, yes i am grateful.
And what qualifies you to say this? Your years of research and experience in search algorithms etc? Get real son. Sure Google have flaws and they're definitely not as innovative as they're given credit for, but when you're expecting them to hire someone to put up relevant pictures for the latest news you're either not knowing what you're speaking of or trolling.
Hi,
Yes, my year of XP.
I'm not talking about hiring one guy to make just the images more relevant, I'm talking about whole teams of SEO plus better algorithm. How can I troll my own thread? My reference to google news images was just a small example of how they abandon poor results while creating Facebook clones.
And I have worked for 3 of the biggest companies in one of the worlds most competitive terms "Poker". So I do have a little XP.
Google's search needs way more human updating and it can;t come from users because he users that will use this feature like Starred Results or plus one are webmasters who are biased. It has to come from them hiring actual people for now until algorithm is better.
But I'm not using the tone your using with me. Just simply stating if you can't see the flaws yourself. The fact that I can't program a spider does not mean I can't see flaws in a search engine. The fact that I can't code a social network does not mean I don't know anything about social media...
facepalm
Last edited by parttimepoker; 08-11-2011 at 11:57 AM.
Google Customer service... Remember all the complaining about FTP customer service? Try emailing Google adwords/adsense and getting a response. Facebook ads is 1000% better than google.
Thought I would update this post since Aaron Wall's post on SEO Book : Spam? Affiliate is a 4 Letter Word | SEO Book.com
He really touches on Google's outright fascism and how they take every opportunity to F affiliates. Here is part of his comments below the article:
"Do I lose business by speaking out against the banking criminals? Probably, as there are a lot of ignorant people in the world. Do I care about losing that business? Not really. The people who still support the banking criminals at this point are not people I would want to help anyhow, and they generally lack the critical thinking skills found in our customers."
Many of you will disagree with me like you normally do but I don't really care. Most of you switch strategies really fast and adapt to Google and Laws that were tailored for them and other monopolies like the casinos monopolies. Good for you. 5% of you will double or triple your profits. 50% of you will just quit. And the other 45% will be happy making 25% of what you made before BF of whatever new law or algorithm.
What I wish everyone would do is come together and fight Caesars and fight Google and put them on the defensive! Then we would all multiply our profits by 1000%.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks