Hey guys, this morning I was looking at the various free bankroll providers for payout amounts to see if any of them were worth sending some lower tier traffic too.
I got to looking at the PokerSource affiliate program today, and I think it's backwards - tell me what you guys think:
Player has the choice of free bankroll, or rakeback - but not both (okay, that makes sense as it's probably CPA vs Revshare).
However, check out the affiliate payouts:
For each room a player takes the free bankroll = $20 CPA
For each room a player takes rakeback = $5 CPA
Now you guys tell me, when a player goes to PokerSource and chooses rakeback over a free $100 bankroll, is it not automatically assumed this is a more educated high value player that can see the "long term" value of the rakeback offer over the free bankroll?
I think PokerSource should consider changing this to allow more residual income for subaffiliates - and possibly more of us would promote stuff like this.
Anyone agree or disagree?