Conversion rates of conversions

[jdwanchalk]

I got my first few signups on PokerStars and they are showing as real money players, but have not yet qualified as CPAs. I would imagine that 90% plus eventually become qualified CPAs on Stars? Is this about right? Seems like the requirements are rather easy to meet...

Also, is there any way to identify the usernames of your signups on Stars?

[Harry Zack]

.

[RaymondM]

Hey jdwanchalk, I have about 15 real money players myself, but only 1 has been qualified as CPA so far.

I think it depends on what type of players they are, if they deposit $10 and are playing micro stakes 1ct/2ct, it will take a long time to collect them 200 FPP. I was trying to play 1ct/2ct games myself and the results were: 1 FPP per hour... The one who qualified was a high stakes player, he qualified over night.

The only way to change it, imho, is to target low/middle/high stakes players.

Good luck!

sorry for my bad english

Raymond.

[GregW]

Almost exactly 50% of RMPs end up qualifying for CPA for me at Stars.

[PokerDude]

I have always had a very poor conversion rate on Stars......probably on the order of 20 % Qualifying CPA's, for every real-time player. That is why I don't promote them heavy at all any more.

[jdwanchalk]

Almost exactly 50% of RMPs end up qualifying for CPA for me at Stars.

There is no time frame for which they must meet the requirement for is there? It theoretically could end up being 100% when all is said and done, no?

[GregW]

There is no time frame for which they must meet the requirement for is there? It theoretically could end up being 100% when all is said and done, no?

Yeah definitely. I only took the stats from the last 10 months or so, so if I was able to run the report in 12 months time to see how many of those players qualified it should be >50%.

This percentage is skewed to the lower side because of the constricted time frame, so I guess it's a fair figure for conversions over the short term.

Over an infinite time scale closer to 100% of rmps could qualify, but from my limited results I'd be surprised if it was over 70% for over a shorter timeframe of 2 years. That's just a guess though.

[jdwanchalk]

Yeah definitely. I only took the stats from the last 10 months or so, so if I was able to run the report in 12 months time to see how many of those players qualified it should be >50%.

This percentage is skewed to the lower side because of the constricted time frame, so I guess it's a fair figure for conversions over the short term.

Over an infinite time scale closer to 100% of rmps could qualify, but from my limited results I'd be surprised if it was over 70% for over a shorter timeframe of 2 years. That's just a guess though.

Right, just wanted to make sure there weren't any stupid rules like on FTP.

[jdwanchalk]

The one who qualified was a high stakes player, he qualified over night.

Forgot to ask about this, how did you know what stakes he played if you can't gain access to the usernames of the players you sign up?

[RaymondM]

I don't actually, just guessing.. He was the first who signed up with the Marketing Code (I tracked him this way) and he qualified very fast, as I said before over night. So, I guess he played medium or high stakes..


Raymond.