
Originally Posted by
pokerprop
To be clear it's not that they don't like to. It's that the more natural and less confusion the conversion process is the more effective it is. If you're website has something of value and they read you'll plenty of opportunities to convert naturally. All the hard sell and bonus code, rakeback, use our links, clear cookies, makes it less natural and therefore less effective then it could be.
Ideally a site should have some CTA - that are catchy - such as US Credit Cards Accept, Payouts in 1 Week (Sitename.com) etc. Something that stands out. but then should support opportunities to convert naturally in text along with opportunities to visit other pages of the site which those contain additional opportunities to convert as well (and it all keeps spiraling together, the endless web of cross linked great content). If it's all natural and sincere, your sign up to first time deposit ratio with be out the roof in comparison to industry averages.
I'm not sure I quite understand where you said 'your sign up to first time deposit ratio'. Are those two the same thing given that the players that visits my site will sign up as a first time depositor.
As far as which market to choose. Strategy is a tough market as a core thing to build a site off of however can be done. I'd much rather start with a theme that involves a brand name that sounds logical enough to rank for a really good term. I wish i had an idea off the top of my head to toss you here but I can't think of one but like PokerScout (which is obviously taken) and its theme is scouting all the major "online poker sites" which is your bigger term goal and can get other versions of it. From here you have stuff like bonus clear rates, game volumes, site features and all sorts of other things - and can build strategy off it. Would we be great is if you could come up with something people could think to reference. Perhaps covering tournament promotions, chip stacks in SNGs, thinks with side by side comparisons. Another good idea is covering currency options at different sites, banking methods by country and site. All types of stuff that your theme is scouting online poker sites and having all the information someone could ever look for all easily accessible by category. From here hot topics are forum complaints and drama, prop bets between members. things that get the forum community digging your site as these are the guys who link places and give tweets. Plus if your popular on forums, other sites popular on forums might link to your content. Without speaking a word you exchange the favor, they do the same, and it starts to build, google trusts your site and you have these other terms to rank for. Now in and around this could build nice strategy if that's your thing and can build it around game names, as well as strategy for specific "online poker sites which your site scouts".
I understand the part about pokerscout.com, not quite sure how I could incorporate all the forum stuff with my idea... yet! My original idea was to provide extremely solid reviews for a particular game (let's say Stud) in 4-5 poker rooms. Do you think this is a good core thing to build the site off? I mean everyone out there has a review for a site. But I want to have reviews so specific where we're telling the visitors (along with the obvious RB%/VIP programme, deposit bonus etc) the traffic of Stud say on PokerStars down to the hour, the level of player pool in Study on PS, the difference in limits of Stud on PS etc etc. I will make those reviews the best and most detailed in the industry for Stud and then work on Stud strategy articles afterwards and use what you said about start to spiral the reviews with strategy articles etc etc. Any criticism on this idea or just general thoughts Sir?
Your not American so not sure this reference makes sense, but there are tons of Mitt Romneys and Obama's out there. If you're sites the Ron Paul it might not win site of the year awards or affiliate of the year awards and the like, but it could for sure have the most passionate visitors. My advice is to think it out really well and find an idea you like and our passionate about and just run with it. At the worse you recognize okay this is not working and you then adjust or start fresh. If this happens okay no worries now you have a site to do 3-way link exchanges from for your next idea etc. In time you'll have experience and a much better understand if your idea is likely to work or not. However you seem to be asking the right questions in advanced which is good and increases the chances you'll find a good spot out of the gate.
Bookmarks