eugh Matt, cba quoting and editing your last thread.
1st point: Basically, i think a hot supermodel winning the wsop would make an impact through every guys magazine, and even many of the women's. That's a huge market base. If you disagree (also kaus), then so be it, agree to disagree.
2nd point: poker being geeky. I base this on all my friends opinions and outlook on poker. Whether or not you imagine them to be losers is irrelevant really, that's subjective. have to admit in my opinion also poker is a bit geeky. staying up at night playing online poker in your bedroom? = anti-social and nerdy.
I would'nt call poker a social game. without a doubt online poker is anti-social. live poker yes it has social aspects, but you are gambling with others and that is generally an anti-social tenant.
Lastly, my point wasn't that sex sells as a generality. it's that there is massive scope and potential for using it in poker, and it is underutilised. and that it can be exploited and utilised so easily.
agree or disagree w/e, wouldn't have wasted my time on this thread if i didn't beleive it.












LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
She is a freakin hottie and ran deep in WSOP 2008/2009 so can obviously play poker.
and from there on out be known as the "Playboy girl of the month, Maxim covergirl and oh yeah she won a tournament of some sort"
Bookmarks