Article submission service

[pokerextras]

I just wanted to let everyone know about an article submission service i've just used. A company called Manual Directory Submission Service & Article Submission will submit multiple different versions of your article to 50 of the top pr ezines MANUALLY for $10. Because of the different versions being submitted you're likely to have most of the submissions indexed, and because of the high pr of the ezines, the links will be of good value. The guy i spoke to there named duan was very helpful and i couldn't rate this service any higher. Just to clarify, i have nothing to do with this company and will not make a cent out of telling you about them. I just really think this is a great service for affiliates, and well worth doing.

[Mark]

Did you see any positive movement in terms of SEO from the service?

Did you see any increase in traffic as a result of using this service? How do you know it worked well for you?

Mark

[pokerextras]

Did you see any positive movement in terms of SEO from the service?

Did you see any increase in traffic as a result of using this service? How do you know it worked well for you?

Mark

i've been using article submissions for a while now, both automatic and manual, and there's no doubt that it helped my seo immensly. The three problems i experienced though were, 1, manual submissions take ages. 2. Automatic submissions get turned away by the top ezines. And 3. Submitting a single article to any more than 10 directories is pointless as only 8 or 9 versions ever get indexed. To get unique versions submitted means that most if not all of the submissions will get indexed, and getting them submitted manually means that they'll be accepted and not rejected by the top ezines. To get this done 50 times for $10 is in my opinion, great value. The beauty of article submissions is that the more time goes by, the more pr the page in the ezine gets, and the more pr is passed on to you. Any traffic you get from the actual articles themselves rather than the google position they help you get is a bonus.

[CK]

Im only suggesting this because of your other post asking for help.

Wouldnt a better approach to getting links be to sit down and write a really well written article than submitting 50 articles to article directories. Surely one solid link to that article would more than make up 50 ezine links.

Im just saying this because I honestly think that would benefit more. Article directories are ok, but nothing I would be spending alot of my time doing. Also assuming that this company is submitting "originals" means that they are taking your original article and spinning it 49 times.

I know some people use article directories and whatnot and that's fine but I dont see how 50 submissions are going to do a whole lot and I would be weary of having 50 articles published within a short timeframe that have the same content & links, spun or not.

Im only posting this because I have used this way back when, and yeah sure its $10, but if a new affiliate comes by and drops a $100 thinking they can get a ton of links for cheap, they would be pretty disappointed at the lack of results and time wasted.

[Steve20]

I prefer more in manual article submission rather than automatic. I can assure in this way that my article is being submitted. What I mean is, I'm not about Automated Article submission not unless lots of people recommend such stuff to me experiencing good results at his/her site.

[pokerextras]

Im only suggesting this because of your other post asking for help.

Wouldnt a better approach to getting links be to sit down and write a really well written article than submitting 50 articles to article directories. Surely one solid link to that article would more than make up 50 ezine links.

Im just saying this because I honestly think that would benefit more. Article directories are ok, but nothing I would be spending alot of my time doing. Also assuming that this company is submitting "originals" means that they are taking your original article and spinning it 49 times.

I know some people use article directories and whatnot and that's fine but I dont see how 50 submissions are going to do a whole lot and I would be weary of having 50 articles published within a short timeframe that have the same content & links, spun or not.

Im only posting this because I have used this way back when, and yeah sure its $10, but if a new affiliate comes by and drops a $100 thinking they can get a ton of links for cheap, they would be pretty disappointed at the lack of results and time wasted.

why do you think that article submissions aren't worth much. I've had this discussion with others on other forums, and the general opinion is that a submitted article to a pr 6 directory, which over time builds up a good pr itself is worth just as much as a link from a websites with equivalant pr. Google doesn't de value the link just because it's an article directory. Surely me submitting an article to a good directory is the same as me getting a link from a new page on your website which we both hope in time will build pr?

[Matt Geer]

Im only suggesting this because of your other post asking for help.

Wouldnt a better approach to getting links be to sit down and write a really well written article than submitting 50 articles to article directories. Surely one solid link to that article would more than make up 50 ezine links.

Im just saying this because I honestly think that would benefit more. Article directories are ok, but nothing I would be spending alot of my time doing. Also assuming that this company is submitting "originals" means that they are taking your original article and spinning it 49 times.

I know some people use article directories and whatnot and that's fine but I dont see how 50 submissions are going to do a whole lot and I would be weary of having 50 articles published within a short timeframe that have the same content & links, spun or not.

Im only posting this because I have used this way back when, and yeah sure its $10, but if a new affiliate comes by and drops a $100 thinking they can get a ton of links for cheap, they would be pretty disappointed at the lack of results and time wasted.

Not only that, but as I mentioned on your other post, I found that most of the quality content that had anything to do with your site wasnt found on your site at all, it was through article submissions. It just makes sense to me to have that type of quality on your site, where you have a little bit more control over what happens verses having it spun several times in hopes that it gets indexed, much less stays online. And what if an article that gets used isn't linking to you anymore? It can't be worth chasing to correct the issue for only $10.........

And above all, you just had an issue dropping in the Serps and you have yet to figure out why...... IMO, it might be worth taking a break from article submission stuff until everything is back to normal.....

[Steve20]

Im only suggesting this because of your other post asking for help.

Wouldnt a better approach to getting links be to sit down and write a really well written article than submitting 50 articles to article directories. Surely one solid link to that article would more than make up 50 ezine links.

Im just saying this because I honestly think that would benefit more. Article directories are ok, but nothing I would be spending alot of my time doing. Also assuming that this company is submitting "originals" means that they are taking your original article and spinning it 49 times.

I know some people use article directories and whatnot and that's fine but I dont see how 50 submissions are going to do a whole lot and I would be weary of having 50 articles published within a short timeframe that have the same content & links, spun or not.

Im only posting this because I have used this way back when, and yeah sure its $10, but if a new affiliate comes by and drops a $100 thinking they can get a ton of links for cheap, they would be pretty disappointed at the lack of results and time wasted.

I do appreciate your help but in some cases, people has different experiences regarding that tool. You can't blame them.

Of course everybody wants to make all things easily. What I'm pointing here, they want is surely.

Thanks for the help.