What page is more likely to get sign ups.

[pokerextras]

What page is better optimised for sign ups? My information page, 27% Full Tilt Poker Rake Back, $600 Bonus, 3 Rake Races Per Month, $5k Weekly Freeroll . Or this hard sale page, Full Tilt Rakeback, FullTilt Poker Bonus Code Download . Any advice and criticism will be warmly recieved, as my conversion rate is pathetic.

[Ridge]

I don't see a difference other than color? The CTA's are very poor on both IMO

[CK]

It looks like every other rakeback site tbh and I personally don't care for the layouts of rakeback sites

Im not sure how much flexability you have with the top bit but I would (if possible) move the rakeback information box above. I mean thats what you have to offer right, so why should the player have to scroll 2/3 of the page to see it. The rest of the above the fold information is the exact same as everybody else. Everybody has 27% rakeback, so give the user a reason to signup with you.

I dont deal with rakeback but Im pretty certain if someone is searching for FT rakeback they are looking for something above and beyond the standard offer. Everyone and thier mother offers 27% FT rakeback in their title tags. So to me this means they are searching for what can I get besides 27%. I could be wrong. Like I said I dont deal with rakeback.

[pokeragain]

it seems you are trying two different layout and domains;
-first of all I believe the closer your domain sounds like rakeback (example rakeback.com, rakemeback.com), the closer the user will feel he is at the right place. So justchillz does not sound like poker.
- for the layout, Get Unbeatable Poker Rakeback Deals has some ideas in it, I do not think I would keep the smiling girl there.
Overall first one is better imho

[pokerextras]

As most of you know, i have no control over the layout of the rakeback engine sites. What i'm actually questioning is the text/content. One of the sites has a detailed full tilt review, the other has, we'll give you x so sign up now. Which of the styles is more effective for conversions.

[sirtiner]

I want to say 1 thing (nothing to do with the review page) and that is to drop the image of the support girl, that is just so damn cheesy (IMO).

[pokerextras]

I want to say 1 thing (nothing to do with the review page) and that is to drop the image of the support girl, that is just so damn cheesy (IMO).

Lol. I'm not sure if that image is stopping people from signing up, but i'll take it on board

[pokeragain]

I did not compare the 2 texts word by word; what I see is:
- in one you have a longer FT review/description, and I believe it is better; because either they do not read it if they know FT already, but if they do read it, more info is better.
- with respect the "give", I see the word give around 7 times or so; and you give races, bonus, freerolls; whatever this should not be omitted anyway, so wherever it is not there, should be there.

[sirtiner]

I just wanted to say it
Everytime i see something like that or the ones that have a couple of ppl on the top header that looks so damn happy i die little inside.

Lol. I'm not sure if that image is stopping people from signing up, but i'll take it on board

[pokerextras]

I just wanted to say it
Everytime i see something like that or the ones that have a couple of ppl on the top header that looks so damn happy i die little inside.

Have you told your psychologist about this?