Review badvariance.com

[Squizzel]

yeah its getting a decent ammount. no sales yet though.

[Squizzel]

now what lol, put CTA's on a bunch of pages, wrote a ton of money pages/reviews, had several thousand views overall, still not one signup.

poker strategy = unprofitable.

[GFPC]

Man i love this site!!! Looks awesome man!! Damn you put a ton of work into it and it looks so nice!!

Maybe this was already mentioned from another thread - but what about massive link building for the term "Poker Strategy".

In my google search your at position 44.

Anyone think this could help?

[BreezeBG]

Squizzel, I am not really experienced at affiliating through search traffic, but maybe there is a significant mismatch between the type of visitors your site is attracting and the offers you are trying to sell to them. I haven't really read the site and offers thoroughly, but at first glance only your Ladbrokes offer has a chance to get some sign ups from players who would search about four bets and similar semiadvanced concepts.

Just because Ladbrokes are fantastic and have "cashback" by default and you have explained that.

It seems to me (at first glance) that you don't offer rakeback at fulltilt or other rooms where it is possible and standard... no matter what affiliates or room managers think about rakeback, a player who cares when to 3 bet and 4 bet just knows about it and won't sign up without it, ever. Plus many of those players won't even sign up on a standard rakeback deal, they will look for something on top of it too.

Just a theory but I think this might really explain how such a great site doesn't get many sign ups.

[Squizzel]

Man i love this site!!! Looks awesome man!! Damn you put a ton of work into it and it looks so nice!!

Maybe this was already mentioned from another thread - but what about massive link building for the term "Poker Strategy".

In my google search your at position 44.

Anyone think this could help?

will never outrank pokerstrategy.com so wont even consider going for it.

[Squizzel]

Squizzel, I am not really experienced at affiliating through search traffic, but maybe there is a significant mismatch between the type of visitors your site is attracting and the offers you are trying to sell to them. I haven't really read the site and offers thoroughly, but at first glance only your Ladbrokes offer has a chance to get some sign ups from players who would search about four bets and similar semiadvanced concepts.

Just because Ladbrokes are fantastic and have "cashback" by default and you have explained that.

It seems to me (at first glance) that you don't offer rakeback at fulltilt or other rooms where it is possible and standard... no matter what affiliates or room managers think about rakeback, a player who cares when to 3 bet and 4 bet just knows about it and won't sign up without it, ever. Plus many of those players won't even sign up on a standard rakeback deal, they will look for something on top of it too.

Just a theory but I think this might really explain how such a great site doesn't get many sign ups.

i had a bunch of rakeback offers on the sidebar heavilly promoted, everoyne told me to remove them + they had tens of thousands of views and not one signup, so they didnt convert either.

TBH, im really getting discouraged with ratios and stuff like that, i will need something like 10 daily visitors to make any decent money, and given the ammount of work and effort it will take to get that, that might take me 5-10 years. lol.

[GFPC]

will never outrank pokerstrategy.com so wont even consider going for it.

I understand that - but number 44 could be improved on.

At least in first page in Google could bring in some good numbers.

Anyways - just a thought - sorry i couldn't be more help.

[Squizzel]

first gets 50% of the clicks, id rather make myself 1st for something less competitive that go for 10th of something super competitive.

that being said, im converting so low, its probably not worth my time to even continue pursuing poker strategy.

[GFPC]

first gets 50% of the clicks, id rather make myself 1st for something less competitive that go for 10th of something super competitive.

that being said, im converting so low, its probably not worth my time to even continue pursuing poker strategy.

Ok buddy!! Hope things turn around for you real soon!! Crossing my fingers for you.

[cernus11]

now what lol, put CTA's on a bunch of pages, wrote a ton of money pages/reviews, had several thousand views overall, still not one signup.

poker strategy = unprofitable.

I’m not sure I would feature PokerStars and Full Tilt as my top two rooms on a strategy site. If someone is looking for complex strategy they are probably signed up to these rooms already. I would feature Bodog probably.

Also I think you could improve on your CTA's. IMO the CTA you have atm is very pretty but it would be skipped over by many players. By incorporating it into the text you would have a much better chance of the players reading it and taking your advice to sign up as it’s also a bit more personal.