Search:

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D





:cool:

But wasn't the point of rake caps to put everyone on the same level? In which case no one should look more attractive. But yea, rake caps WEREN'T a way to circumvent the rake caps. Ha!

Ok, this is not at all comparable. Like I said earlier, however, density is a tough wall to penetrate.

I am not going to waste my time convincing someone who can't be convinced. This is just one...

Chalkie-I made 100% valid points over and over. You are a rakeback guy as well. It is no coincidence that the rakeback people are the ones so against what I have been saying for awhile, you just...

Here you go Zujo. No, this person is obviously not me...

Two Plus Two Poker Forums - View Single Post - Petition to Stop FTP from cutting affiliates %

"The turnover rate on these sites is...

Good way to evade all of the 100% valid points I made.

............

Thank you, I have been saying that for months.

I realize I piss off some people on here, but a dense wall is hard to penetrate.

Ok, well you made it seem like I said FTP is the same as Carbon. I never said that, they are comparable, however.

You really are splitting hairs here. Merge/Cake is an alternative to FTP, an...

Also Zujo, this is something I would bet my life on. There is not the slightest shred of doubt in my mind that FTP would see a lot of the moron rakeback mass multi tablers go to Merge/Cake.

Lol. WHEN DID I COMPARE THEM?

8% is a difference that players would multi table across two networks (Merge and Cake) if they didn't put all of their money on just one of the networks. Plenty of...

It's simple. Players will go to another site that offers 30%+. 27% is fine for most players (as opposed to 30%+), but an 8% cut is just too much. I could assure you Merge and Cake would be thrilled...

If I was allowed to extensively address this I would. Since I am not I will retort with one thing...rakeback is why the games are so dead now.

Also, I obviously meant lowered rake as a compromise...

Terrible points all around.

In all of your infinite wisdom, how have you not considered that no rakeback would mean less rake?

No rakeback means everyone could be on MGR, if MGR was lowered to 25% on all sites, that would...

LOL. You are RIDICULOUS.

So, Randy, if no one offered rakeback, you still think the players are going to say "Arghhhhhh I am not playing me pokers anymore because I have no rakeback!"

If there...

Yes, actually.

No, you just refuse to see how rakeback is bad for the industry as a whole.

If rakeback eventually is eliminated you will be making more money. What I don't get is why you don't understand this....

One more step towards the elimination of rakeback. I like it.