His reasoning wasn't dead on. It was very silly fanaticism, which is inappropriate for a President. Good luck supporting him, but I can't see how anyone can rationalize throwing away money on him...
Type: Posts; User: 321
His reasoning wasn't dead on. It was very silly fanaticism, which is inappropriate for a President. Good luck supporting him, but I can't see how anyone can rationalize throwing away money on him...
His argument isn't well thought out. It is idiotic beyond words. You are supporting a total crackpot who has a fanatical allegiance to a dumbass principle that does not bend to common sense or...
A better President than Paul??? Of the candidates possibly running... Obama, Huntsman, Romney, Daniels, Pawlenty, Roemer, Huckabee, Santorum... basically everybody (though Santorum is pushing it)...
The basic problem of what you wrote boils down to your either/or thinking... the only sensible answer is you need both. There are stop lights at intersections because it is crackpot insane to let...
Since I don't believe corporations can do anything they want without any legal restraints, Ron Paul is not on any side I'd ever want to be on.
Limited government ≠ Ron Paul
Two limited...
Liberterianism is not "businesses should be free to do anything they want", and Paul's inconsistent positions come from twisting a philosophy in circles.
The vast majority of people are never...
Not much of a place to talk about this, but one of the worst aspects of this country is that crackpots like Ron Paul somehow get decent people to seriously mention his name. In the first place, he...
The man is such an imbecile. And he's the poster child for fighting over trivia (whether it is a birth certificate or a flagpole) while destroying any chances he has of success with the big things. ...