New Posts

Rss

Archives for : Regulated Online Gambling

Amaya Gaming’s Reverse Acquisition of PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker

Amaya PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker SaleThe rumors proved true. Amaya Gaming and PokerStars announced the deal via a press release late in the evening of June 12.

Amaya will acquire Oldford Group, parent company of Rational Group, which owns and operates PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker. The agreement is worth $4.9 billion.

The deal includes all issued and outstanding shares of Oldford, and all of the assets associated with the company. PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker alone have more than 85 million registered players on the online poker sites, with PokerStars by-and-large the biggest Internet poker entity in the world.

Figures included in the press release show that the pro forma combined revenue for Amaya and Oldford in 2013 was $1.3 billion, and the EBITDA was $474.8 million. Adjusted EBITDA, before interest, financing costs, taxes, and other costs, was $473.8 million, and that estimated adjusted EBITDA for 2014 (back-dating to January 1, 2014 for the buyout) is $600 million to $640 million.

Some estimated the worth of PokerStars to be more alone than the $4.9 billion sale price of Oldford, but the exclusion from the United States market dented that worth and may have reduced the price to one that worked for both parties.

Amaya didn’t have $5 billion cash on hand for the transaction, but a $50 million deposit started the deal. The Blackstone Group will assist in financing some of the debt, as has an unnamed investment manager. A combination of cash, new debt, subscription receipts, common shares, and preferred shares will be used to complete the sale.

Business as Usual, Mostly

Despite the size and scope of the deal, not to mention its possible impact on the global and United States gaming markets, business at PokerStars, Full Tilt Poker, and Amaya Gaming is said to be moving forward as usual. Players on the gaming sites will not see any change in their day-to-day activities.

PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker will continue to offer the same games to the same markets, for the time being.

Tours like the European Poker Tour, Latin American Poker Tour, and UK & Ireland Poker Tour (just to name a few) will operate with PokerStars as their sponsor without any changes to their respective live event schedules.

The Rational Group will continue working from its Isle of Man offices, as well as current sub-offices, and Amaya will stay in its Montreal headquarters.

Amaya and PokerStars Management Shuffle

There are a few people involved in Rational Group that will see a change. In fact, that change is an integral part of the agreement and one that will likely give Amaya a better chance to offer online gaming services to more states in America.

Oldford Group founder and Chief Executive Officer Mark Scheinberg will sell all of his company shares to a subsidiary of Amaya, as will other Oldford shareholders. Scheinberg and several other executives will resign from their positions and leave the company altogether.

The exit of Mark and Isai Scheinberg is a key component for PokerStars to gain entry into New Jersey. Though Amaya has a fully executed and valid license, its new agreement with PokerStars will need to be reexamined.

Since PokerStars’ license application was on hold due to the pending US Department of Justice indictment against Isai Scheinberg, this move may signal a new chapter for Amaya, PokerStars, and New Jersey Internet gaming.

Speaking of Regulated Markets

The press release specifically addressed the entry of PokerStars and Full Tilt to regulated markets and named the United States as the most pertinent.

“Amaya believes the transaction will expedite the entry of PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker into regulated markets in which Amaya already holds a footprint.”

Quite a few states have bad actor clauses in place or prepared for upcoming legislative opportunities, but many in the online gaming industry hope that the Amaya deal will shine a new light on “bad actors.”

The Poker Players Alliance was quick to praise the buyout with respect to the positive effect it may have on PokerStars and the regulated US market. “Amaya’s acquisition should remove any perceived impediment for this popular brand to once again be available to players in regulated US jurisdictions,” said PPA Executive Director John Pappas.

He went further to explain his hope that the news “will bring the gaming industry together – tribes, commercial casinos, card rooms, lotteries, and others – to push as a united front for state and federal legislation that licenses and regulated Internet poker.”

Affiliate Marketing Details Released by New Jersey Regulator

Affiliate Marketing Online Gambling In NJThe online gaming affiliate industry was a thriving market in the United States before the UIGEA and Black Friday, and it has yet to gain much ground at all since the regulation of online gaming in New Jersey.

The primary reason is that affiliate marketing had yet to be thoroughly addressed by the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement. Affiliates had been awaiting further instruction for months before an official document was released on June 9, 2014.

Licensing of Internet Marketing Companies Overview

The Director’s Advisory Bulletin was issued from the State of New Jersey and signed by DGE Director David Rebuck. It aimed to address the licensing of Internet marketing companies, better known in the industry as affiliates.

Two licenses are available for the entities – vendor registration or ancillary casino service industry enterprises. Compensation dictates the type of license required.

For instance, if affiliates are paid a flat fee for directing traffic to an online gaming site, they require a vendor license. An ancillary license is for companies who are paid based on player activity on those sites.

Vendors

The vendor registration license is for companies paid a certain fee when a user clicks on a banner or link for a New Jersey gaming site, based on how many people view a particular advertisement, or for an official partnership.

This type of license also applies to affiliates taking a flat fee for sign-ups, deposits, site downloads, or a particular number of bets or amount wagered.

Ancillaries

Affiliates must request an ancillary casino service industry enterprises (CSIE) license if pay is dependent upon gaming action. For instance, if an affiliate is paid a percentage of every deposit or a fee based on the amount of money a player wins or loses on the Internet gaming site, the ancillary license is required.

Revenue share revenue is also a determinant for an ancillary license, meaning the affiliate is paid a percentage of the net gaming for a user.

Sub-Affiliates

The document from the DGE goes on to discuss sub-affiliates, which are entities that are paid by the primary affiliate for referring players to a particular online gaming company. The bases for sub-affiliate licenses are the same as indicated above for vendors versus ancillaries.

Sub-affiliates must submit their contracts with primary affiliates to the DGE for the proper license. Should a sub-affiliate fail to obtain the proper license and file the necessary paperwork, the DGE can take regulatory action against that company as well as the master affiliate. Licenses could be revoked for failing to comply with all of the requirements.

Allowances

The DGE also details some of the allowances for affiliates in New Jersey. One of those is the ability to use a “refer a friend” application for which an affiliate takes a flat fee. Should an affiliate receive less than $2,500 per calendar year for this service, no license is required for that operation.

Affiliates are also allowed to switch compensation models as long as they remain in the same licensing class. While those changes require the DGE’s approval, they may be implemented without preapproval.

Requirements

All affiliates, no matter the license held, must submit a monthly report for the DGE’s Service Industry Licensing Bureau and Intake Unit. The documents must include details of all monies changing hands for any type of activities. License holders and platform providers must comply.

Lastly, all affiliate activity must take place in and be conducted with customers in the state of New Jersey. Any violations can result in the revocation of a license or other regulatory action deemed appropriate. The exact rules are given to the affiliate upon the completion of the licensing process.

The Inside Scoop – Restoration of America’s Wire Act = The Real Bad Actors

Inside Scoop Column


The past week in the U.S. online gambling industry has seen no shortage of news. It’s been exciting to see more states such as New York, California, and Pennsylvania inching closer by the day to regulating online gambling within their borders.

Unfortunately, amongst all the excitement there is still the industry Grinch, better known as Sheldon Adelson, who continues to be a thorn in the side of the U.S. regulated online gambling markets.

Restoration of America’s Wire Act – What Is It?

Last Wednesday, two new bills were introduced in the congress and senate that would effectively ban online gambling once again in all 50 states in the U.S. This would also include states such as New Jersey, Delaware, and Nevada where online gambling is currently legal and regulated.

Coined as the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (H.R. 4301), this bill aims to change the language in the existing Wire Act to include “any bet or wager” placed over a wire (telephone, internet, etc.), with the exception of fantasy sports and horse racing.

Let us keep in mind how senseless this is, however, since the original wire act was signed into law over 50 years ago to prevent organized crime and the mafia from running sports betting operations across state lines.

Further to this, in September 2011, the United States Department of Justice publicly released a formal legal opinion on the scope of the Act that concluded,

“Interstate transmissions of wire communications that do not relate to a ‘sporting event or contest’ fall outside the reach of the Wire Act.”

Why Is H.R. 4301 Being Introduced Then?

I could write this entire section in three words, “Follow The Money.” Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) and U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) however introduced H.R. 4301 in a “bi-partisan” fashion.

Graham was recently quoted saying

“This is yet another example of the Holder Justice Department and Obama Administration ignoring the law.”

With all due respect Senator, last I checked, in 2011 the DOJ released a very accurate interpretation of the law as noted above.

Question: So, with all the acceptance and regulation of online gambling emerging across the U.S., why is this bill being introduced all of sudden?

Answer: Sheldon Adelson

Billionaire, hypocrite, and opponent of online gambling, Sheldon Adelson has decided to make it his life’s mission to make online gambling illegal. And while on this mission, he has pledged to spend whatever amount of money it takes.

With election season coming up, and campaigns in need of cash infusions, you can bet that supporters of this bill such as Graham and Chaffetz who are certainly not shoe-ins to win their elections are going to be seeing nice “campaign contributions” coming into their coffers soon.

Then you have the likes of Texas Governor Rick Perry sending a letter to congress affirming his support for the bill. Of course he will be running for President again, and would love nothing more than to be able to dip into Sheldon Adelson’s piggy bank for his presidential run.

Other sellout politicians in the senate who cosponsored this bill are Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Mike Lee (R-UT) and Kelly Ayotte (R-NH).

The legislation is cosponsored in the House of Representatives by Reps. Tulsi Gabbard (D – HI), Jim Matheson (D – UT), Lamar Smith (R – TX), Jim Jordan (R – OH), Trent Franks (R – AZ), George Holding (R – NC), Frank Wolf (R – VA), James Lankford (R – OK), and Emanuel Cleaver (D – MO).

So I Ask You, Who Are The Real Bad Actors?

Since the term “bad actors” has been thrown around so loosely in our industry as of lately, I’d like to ask, who are the real bad actors?

It’s the U.S. politicians that are paid $170k a year by We The People whom do nothing more than accept bribes and let big business make their decisions for them.

With the recent statements and push by Sheldon Abelson’s Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling (CSIG), this bill makes it blatantly obvious that these politicians are simply gold diggers looking for access to the old man’s money to win their next election.

I mean come on, why would Texas governor Rick Perry go out of his way to send a letter like this otherwise?

Thank-you corrupt politicians for turning the U.S. government into a true corporatocracy. It’s actually quite embarrassing.

Can The Restoration of America’s Wire Act H.R. 4301 Pass?

With enough money, anything is possible. But John Mehaffey said it best:

When it comes down to it, states’ rights and the Tenth Amendment will cause many that are not interested at all in gambling to oppose prohibition or regulation of online gaming at a federal level.”

As you can read in John’s column, and others across the Internet, the odds of this bill gaining enough support to actually pass is slim. Likewise, can you imagine all the individuals working in the online gambling industry in the regulated states suddenly being unemployed courtesy of Uncle Sam?

Bottom line, it’s a ridiculous bill, and one that is all about collecting campaign contributions versus serving constituents.

And if you’re wondering just how ridiculous Sheldon Adelson’s CSIG really is, check out this video featured in JohnnyG’s latest smackdown with all of its fear mongering and propaganda. And if you want a really good laugh, go to YouTube or reddit and read the comments.